EURO-MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE
The role of cultural
diversity on the threshold of the new millennium
Amman,
10-11 October 2000
MEETING
CONCLUSIONS
1. OVERALL ASPECTS
At the end of the first
quinquennium of our Partnership (1996-2000), we recognise that in partner
Countries of the “Southern shore” reformations are unable to take off, it is
probably due to global economy changes. This is the reason why we would offer a
concrete contribution to the next Conference to be held in Marseilles in
November. This event aims at defining again the main rules of the Partnership
and at facilitating realisation procedures.
2. PARTNERSHIP MECHANISMS
Although we do appreciate EU action aiming at
strengthening Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, we cannot hide difficulties faced
on the way: the Union is carrying out several projects with slackness and
consequent dispersion of resources. The Declaration of Barcelona of November
1995 was welcomed as an historical turning point of Euro-Mediterranean
relations. Unfortunately bureaucracy, rules and procedures prevented the
Partnership from making the best use of its high potentials.
3.THE
ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY
The total involvement and
participation of the most representative structures of civil Society is
indispensable,
through structural supports
and by differentiating rules and procedures in accordance to their legitimacy
and representativity.
4.
THE ROLE OF INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE
The wellness of the hole
region depends upon the capacity for each country to produce extra-richness.
Economic development is an essential condition for social stability and
security. Intercultural dialogue, mutual identification and a complete trust in
dissimilar cultures are a crucial factor for political stability. There is no
peace without security, there is no security without peace: culture has to
enable us not to remain trapped in this vicious circle.
5.
POLITICS AND CULTURE
Politics and culture must be
the main “forces” to guarantee the ethical uprightness that economics seems to
have lost, by obeying to “profit belief” only.
6.
ACTIONS TO UNDERTAKE IN THE CONFERENCE OF MARSEILLES:
I.
To reconsider MEDA programme procedures, reviewing the financial
Regulation and rationally organising
the activities: a strategy must be supported aiming at sustaining actions and
organisations able to ensure continuity and success to planned projects.
II.
To create conditions to let the MEDA programme promote the meeting of
all the members for the realisation of the Partnership, each of them will give
his contribution in relation with his own competencies. All the actions must be
associated in a global vision, avoiding repetition of previous actions.
III.
To establish by 2010– as indicated in the Conference of Barcelona in
1995- an Euro-Mediterranean area of free trade focusing on the great
prospective that this challenge involves. But “Goods cannot move by
themselves”, we must remind their importance as instruments of dialogue and
cultural, knowledge and tradition exchange.
IV.
To write “The Chart for Peace and Stability”, in order to exactly
define the role of “Soft Security”: a kind of co-operation to manage conflicts
risen in the Mediterranean area, not only through political and military
instruments, but also using intercultural dialogue that may turn differences
and cultural diversities into a precious resource.
V.
To tackle in a programmatic way the problem of “Democracy and Human
Rights” stressed during the Conference of
Stugard in April 1999. It is necessary to claim human rights’
universality in order to promote a “policy of rights” that overcomes the
“Nation-State” becoming “the main policy” of larger spaces without frontiers,
without “owners”, without conflicts, in other words Euro-Mediterranean space.
VI.
To strengthen the dialogue among people instilling a new balance that
bases on politics feeding it and creating a new culture: a “Force” able to
influence historical processes actually dominated only by economics and
politics.
VII.
To integrate intervention instruments of the Union, the Member States
and financial Institution, with the attempt to empower the impact of
reformations making Meda funds
act as an incentive.
VIII.
To evaluate the work developed by important organisations of Civil
Society in order to originate programmatic synergies giving visibility to
Euro-Mediterranean area.
IX.
To come to a mutual agreement between politics and culture: we heard
too many words not followed by the realisation of projects. There’s the need in
the Mediterranean area of a singular capacity of action, able to work out projects
and carry them out successfully and in the fixed terms.
X.
To support Euro-Mediterranean organisations that has demonstrated to
possess such a great operative ability to represent an example to be followed.